Ready for a gun control essay? Take a look at this informational resource featuring an outline, APA style format and a list of references. Use ideas from this essay sample to form the focus of your writing assignment.

Sample Essay on Gun Control

Introduction

Looking for an essay related to Gun Control Essay Example? A LIMITED TIME OFFER. Get a custom essay written according to your requirements. Save time and grade. From only $16 $12/page 

The United States continues to experience a pervasive gun culture owing to its colonial history, revolutionary roots, frontier expansion, and the Second Amendment. According to the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Cornell Law School, 2017). Proponents of gun control argue that the amendment did not target the common citizen but militias. However, the opponents argue that the amendment guarantees express rights for individual gun ownership. This paper argues that gun control is important for solving mass shooting problems and crime reduction.

Stricter gun control laws are needed for addressing the persistent mass shooting problem in the U.S. The gun control debate might have been made irrelevant by probably the worst mass shooting in the U.S. history that occurred on October 1, 2017 in Las Vegas. The shooting, conducted by a common citizen possessing a gun, claimed 59 lives and left 500 people with serious injuries (Swift, 2017). The Second Amendment does not allow for such heinous acts in the name of owning a gun. So many innocent lives should not be lost at the hands of one person who judges it right, out of their personal reasons, to terminate human lives. The mass shooting incidences clearly indicate that there is more threat of lives being lost through misuse of guns than the threat of people losing their lives due to lack of self-defense.

Gun control would also help address misinterpretation of the Second Amendment by individual gun owners. It is apparent that people are misinterpreting the amendment to mean what was not intended by framers of the constitution given the past shooting incidences. A clear reinterpretation of a “well-regulated militia” should be sought by the three federal government braches in collaboration with the state governments. It is definite that those who debated over and passed the amendment could not have authorized the October 1, 2017 Las Vegas shooting incidence and such other incidences. Moreover, “The Founding Fathers, who lived before the invention of the Gatling gun, could not have envisioned civilians commanding the right to hunt turkeys, or humans, with modern ferocity” (Insana, 2017).

Additionally, deaths resulting from individually-owned guns would decrease if stricter gun laws were adopted. Between 1999 and 2013, there were 464,033 gun deaths out of which 174,773 resulted from homicides, 9,983 from gun accidents, and 270,237 from suicide (Street, 2016). It is thus crystal clear that individual gun owners are using guns in more destructive ways than just mass shootings. It is apparent that letting an American citizen own a personal gun provides them with a quicker way of committing suicide if they had the plans to. Noteworthy, gun suicide is the exact opposite of self-defense and crime prevention, the reasons for which gun ownership was allowed. Acquiring guns should thus be made very difficult for people since it would make them safer from their own selves.

Opponents of gun control argue that gun control laws would infringe into people’s right to self-defense and thus deny them a sense of safety. This argument fails to recognize that even the safety of the gun holder herself or himself is compromised by weak gun control laws (Purcell, 2013). Moreover, the safety of all American citizens wherever they may be is the responsibility of the federal government. It would be enough to guarantee this safety by building and maintaining strong security agencies and policies. Besides, if an individual cannot first of all defend themselves against themselves, the “right to self-defense” argument loses its meaning. When a person uses their own gun to cause self-harm either knowingly or unknowingly, it means they lack the very self-defense the gun is meant for.

Opponents may also argue that gun control laws give too much power to the government and that this may make the government tyrannical. In their view, the government may end up taking away guns from all citizens. This argument is wrong first because the United States is a country founded on strong Constitutional provisions that clearly spell out the rights of citizens and indicate that the country is democratic. There is thus no room for government tyranny, not even through gun control. Second, stricter gun laws would only make difficult the process of acquiring guns but not take away all guns from citizens (Kopel, 2013).

Conclusion

The U.S. should enact and implement very strict gun ownership laws if it is to solve mass shooting problems and reduce gun-related crime. People cannot purport to be enjoying the provisions of the Second Amendment while continuing to butcher innocent citizens. The amendment should be reinterpreted so that it serves all citizens in the best manner possible if it is what is creating all this loss of life and lawlessness. The Constitution does not provide for the “right” of taking one’s own life or that of others. It is thus sad that this phenomenon is being perpetuated by gun ownership.

 

References

Cornell Law School. (2017). Second Amendment. LII / Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. Retrieved May 20, 2018 from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment

Insana, R. (2017). The Time for Polite Debate on Gun Control Is Over. CNBC. Retrieved May 20, 2018 from https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/05/the-time-for-polite-debate-on-gun-control-is-over.html

Kopel, D. B. (2013). The Truth about Gun Control. New York, NY: Encounter Books.

Purcell, T. (2013). Shotgun Republic: The Gun Control Debate. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Street, C. (2016). Gun Control: Guns in America, the Full Debate, More Guns Less Problems? No Guns No Problems?. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Swift, H. (2017). Gunman’s Girlfriend Arrives in U.S. and Is Expected to Be Questioned. Nytimes.com. Retrieved May 20, 2018 from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/03/us/las-vegas-shooting-live-updates.html

 

Gun Control Essay Outline

Introduction

Thesis:

Gun control is important for solving mass shooting problems and crime reduction.

Body

Paragraph 1:

Stricter gun control laws are needed for addressing the persistent mass shooting problem in the U.S.

  • The gun control debate might have been made irrelevant by probably the worst mass shooting in the U.S. history that occurred on October 1, 2017 in Las Vegas.
  • The shooting claimed 59 lives and left 500 people with serious injuries.
  • The Second Amendment does not allow for such heinous acts in the name of owning a gun.
  • Innocent lives should not be lost at the hands of one person who judges it right to terminate human lives.

Paragraph 2:

Gun control would help address misinterpretation of the Second Amendment by individual gun owners.

  • It is apparent that people are misinterpreting the amendment to mean what was not intended by framers of the constitution.
  • A clear reinterpretation of a “well-regulated militia” should be sought.
  • Those who debated over and passed the amendment could not have authorized mass shootings of innocent citizens.

Paragraph 3:

Deaths resulting from individually-owned guns would decrease if stricter gun laws were adopted.

  • Between 1999 and 2013, there were 464,033 gun deaths out of which 174,773 resulted from homicides, 9,983 from gun accidents, and 270,237 from suicide.
  • Thus, individual gun owners are using guns in more destructive ways than just mass shootings.
  • Gun suicide is the exact opposite of self-defense and crime prevention, the reasons for which gun ownership was allowed.

Paragraph 4:

Opponents of gun control argue that gun control laws would infringe into people’s right to self-defense and thus deny them a sense of safety.

  • This argument fails to recognize that even the safety of the gun holder herself or himself is compromised by weak gun control laws.
  • Moreover, the safety of all American citizens wherever they may be is the responsibility of the federal government.
  • It would be enough to guarantee this safety by building and maintaining strong security agencies and policies.

Paragraph 5:

Opponents argue that gun control laws give too much power to the government and that this may make the government tyrannical.

  • This argument is wrong because the United States is a country founded on strong Constitutional provisions that clearly spell out the rights of citizens and indicate that the country is democratic.
  • There is no room for government tyranny.

Conclusion

The U.S. should enact and implement very strict gun ownership laws if it is to solve mass shooting problems and reduce gun-related crime. People cannot purport to be enjoying the provisions of the Second Amendment while continuing to butcher innocent citizens.

Gudwriter Essay Writing

Special offer! Get 20% discount on your first order. Promo code: SAVE20


gudwriter

Gudwriter.com is a leading academic writing service that is dedicated to providing extra support and help to students all over the world. Through our website, students can request for help in a diverse range of subjects and disciplines. We understand that studies are the foundation of success; yet they can be quite a challenge without extra help. Ours, therefore, is to pick up where your lecturers stop by providing you with a reliable process for meeting your academic needs