Do My Essay!
Do not waste time. Get a complete paper today.
Our leading custom writing service provides custom written papers in 80+ disciplines. Order essays, research papers, term papers, book reviews, assignments, dissertation, thesis or extensive dissertations & our expert ENL writers will easily prepare a paper according to your requirements.
You’ll get your high quality plagiarism-free paper according to your deadline! No Bullshit!!
Want some inspiration for writing a 2 paragraph essay? Here is an example on plea bargaining.
Plea bargaining is a core element of the criminal justice system in the United States. Plea bargains allow defendants to turn in a guilty plea to get sentences that are more lenient (Lynch 22). Prosecutors play a central role in plea-bargaining as they are responsible for convincing criminals to accept the terms of the plea bargain. Some advantages of plea bargaining include easing the workload for prosecutors and judges, reducing overcrowding in courts, and that it is economical to the defendant in respect of finances and time consumed by a trial (“Plea Bargains” 1). Noteworthy, the main beneficiaries of plea bargaining are judges, prosecutors, and defendants. As already seen, the work of the prosecutors and judges become easier. In the same breadth, the defendant is likely to get a lenient sentencing as opposed to the one they would get if they did not submit a plea bargain. This situation raises the question regarding the place of the victim whose interests are supposedly at the heart of the criminal justice system. Does plea bargains deny victims or complainants the opportunity to fully get justice for the crime committed against them?
Undeniably, plea bargaining has set a bad trend in the criminal justice system by neglecting the interests of the victims. Indeed, a victim usually has high expectations that the justice system will provide the platform where he or she can seek legal redress for crimes that violate his or her rights as guaranteed under the Constitution. However, when the system turns justice into a “commodity” that can be subjected to bargaining, it negates the very law that it is supposed to uphold. Obviously, victims in such cases do not get justice for the crimes committed against them as the criminals get away with lighter sentences. Although there is the possibility of acquittal when a case goes to trial, the prosecutor in conjunction with the investigating authorities should do a thorough job in collecting evidence. This way, they may be in a position to present a watertight case against the defendant. Certainly, plea bargaining offers the prosecutor and investigating authorities a way to avoid the herculean yet necessary work of gathering evidence against the defendant. Of course, this means that they are not discharging their duties effectively and are thus not meeting the expectations of the public. Thus, the concept of plea bargaining is not good for the justice system.
Lynch, Timothy. The case against plea bargaining. Cato Institute, 2003, pp. 24-27, http://www.pablolinzoain.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/The-Case-Against-Plea-Bargaining-.pdf.
“Plea Bargains: In Depth”. Findlaw, 2019, https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/plea-bargains-in-depth.html. Accessed 8 July 2020.